Community-Level Resource Development and Management, Part 2: A Transferable Approach to Feasibility Analysis for Biogas as an Alternative Cooking Fuel
Energy access for all is the seventh Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) put forth by the United Nations in 2015. This sustainable development goal has been taken on by many non-governmental organisations (NGOs), national governments and communities alike. Traditional Sub-Saharan African approaches to cooking often rely on three-stone fires (or other open wood fires). The smoke from these open cooking fires is known to cause significant adverse health impacts. Thus, access to cleaner energy sources is especially important to improve cooking conditions. One alternative cooking fuel is biogas, which has the advantages of smoke reduction, and decreased reliance on and impact of firewood collection. In this article, we develop a method of analysing the feasibility of biogas projects for some rural communities. The method we describe enables both evaluation of small-scale anaerobic digester designs for specific settings and determination of the scale, cost, and effectiveness of a biogas digester. For example, in a cooking application, 1 mÂ³ of biogas can replace 1.3 kg of firewood and the associated time (approximately 10 minutes) spent collecting firewood. Such technology evaluation is critical for helping communities and organisations determine whether this type of project is well suited for their settings. All too often, development project concepts are funded prematurely, before the realisation that the implemented technology does not function properly or is unsustainable for specific applications. The feasibility analysis we describe is a contribution to the literature, because it provides a condense and, simply written resource to enable development practitioners, volunteers and communities in a rural setting, evaluate sustainable biogas energy solutions prior to investment and implementation.
International Plumbing Code (2015) International Code Council. Available at: https://codes.iccsafe.org/public/document/code/550/9794943 (Accessed: 2 May 2018).
Biogasplant (2014a) Balloon Digester, Build-A-Biogas-Plant. Available at: http://www.build-a-biogas-plant.com/author/biogasplant/ (Accessed: 31 May 2018).
Biogasplant (2014b) Floating Drum Biogas, Build-A-Biogas-Plant. Available at: http://www.build-a-biogas-plant.com/floating-drum-biogas/ (Accessed: 31 May 2018).
Cheng, S. et al. (2014) â€˜Development and application of prefabricated biogas digesters in developing countriesâ€™, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. Elsevier, 34, pp. 387â€“400. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2014.03.035.
Climate: Kyela (2018) Climate Data. Available at: https://en.climate-data.org/location/26733/ (Accessed: 15 May 2018).
Council of Scientific & Insdustrial Research (2007) Ferrocement Applications. Ghaziabad.
Fry, L. J., Merrill, R. and Merrill, Y. (1973) â€˜Methane Digesters For Fuel Gas and Fertilizer with Complete Instructions for Two Working Modelsâ€™, The New Alchemy Institute, (3), pp. 1â€“58. Available at: http://large.stanford.edu/courses/2010/ph240/cook2/docs/methane_digesters.pdf.
Garmin Ltd. (2016) Garmin GPSMAP 64 Ownerâ€™s Manual. Olathe. Available at: http://static.garmin.com/pumac/GPSMAP64_OM_EN.pdf.
Global Alliance for Clean Cookstoves (2016) Safe Access to Fuel and Energy (SAFE), WPF Climate and Disaster Risk Reduction Program. Rome. Available at: http://www.safefuelandenergy.org/about/index.cfm.
Khatavkar, A. and Matthews, S. (2013) Technical Brief: BIO-LATRINES. Nairobi. Available at: https://www.pseau.org/outils/ouvrages/practical_action_bio_latrines_2013.pdf.
Kuria, J. and Maringa, M. (2008) â€˜Developing Simple Procedures for Selecting , Sizing , Scheduling of Materials and Costing of Small Bio â€“ Gas Unitsâ€™, International Journal for Service Learning in Engineering, 3(1), pp. 9â€“40.
Lee, S. G., Trimi, S. and Kim, C. (2013) â€˜The impact of cultural differences on technology adoptionâ€™, Journal of World Business. Elsevier Inc., 48(1), pp. 20â€“29. doi: 10.1016/j.jwb.2012.06.003.
Mittal, S., Ahlgren, E. O. and Shukla, P. R. (2018) â€˜Barriers to biogas dissemination in India: A reviewâ€™, Energy Policy, 112(January 2017), pp. 361â€“370. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2017.10.027.
Mshandete, A. M. and Parawira, W. (2009) â€˜Biogas Technology Research in Selected Sub-Saharan African Countries â€“ A Reviewâ€™, African Journal of Biotechnology, 8(2), pp. 116â€“125. doi: 10.1080/07388550902823674.
Oxfam (2008) Septic Tank Guidelines, Oxfam Technical Briefing Notes. Available at: https://policy-practice.oxfam.org.uk/publications/septic-tank-guidelines-126711.
Oxfam (2011) Design , construction and maintenance of a biogas generator. Oxford.
Peace Corps (2018) Resource Library, PCLive. Available at: https://pclive.peacecorps.gov/pclive/index.php/library (Accessed: 21 May 2018).
Polprasert, C., Nukulchai, W. K. and Rajput, V. S. (1982) â€˜A Ferrocement Digester : Biogas and Biomass Productionâ€™, Journal of Ferrocement, 12(1), pp. 25â€“34.
Preston, K. M. (2012) Fuelwood Collection and Consumption: A Case Study in Lupeta, Tanzania. Michigan Technological University. Available at: https://www.mtu.edu/peacecorps/programs/forestry/pdfs/katie-preston-thesis-final.pdf.
Tempel, A. (2008) Sustainable sanitation, Sustianable Sanitation Alliance. Available at: https://www.flickr.com/people/23116228@N07 (Accessed: 31 May 2018).
Wellinger, A., Murphy, J. and Baxter, D. (2013) The Biogas Handbook. 1st Editio. Oxford: Woodhead Publishing.
Werner, U., StÃ¶hr, U. and Hees, N. (1989) Biogas plants in animal husbandry. Deutsches Zentrum fÃ¼r Entwicklungstechnologien.
Zaia (2013) Biogas project update, Kendall Permaculture. Available at: https://kendallpermaculture.com/2013/07/05/biogas-project-update-may/ (Accessed: 31 May 2018).
Zhu, J. (2015) Sustainable Development Knowledge Platform, United Nations Department of Public Information. Available at: https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/?menu=1300 (Accessed: 30 April 2018).
Authors retain copyright over their work and licence the work to the journal under a Creative Commons 3.0 Attribution (CC-BY) Licence. The CC-BY licence is the most open licence in terms of enabling free distribution and communication of the work. Works prepared using contents of the journal must reference the author(s) and the journal.