Embedding Systems Thinking into EWB Project Planning and Development: Assessing the Utility of a Group Model Building Approach

  • Kimberly Pugel University of Colorado Boulder
  • Jeffrey P Walters Universidad Diego Portales, Santiago, Chile
Keywords: group model building, project planning, sustainability, system dynamics modelling, systems thinking


Amongst growing sociotechnical efforts, engineering students and professionals both in the international development sector and industry are challenged to approach projects more holistically to achieve project goals.  Engineering service learning organizations must similarly adapt their technological projects to consider varying cultural and economic structures, ensuring more resilient social progress within development efforts.  In practice, systems thinking approaches can be utilized to model the social, economic, political, and technological implications that influence the sustainability of an engineering project. This research assesses the utility of integrating systems thinking into Engineers Without Borders (EWB) project planning and development, thereby improving project impact and more effectively engaging members.  At a workshop held at an EWB-USA 2016 Regional Conference, the authors presented a planning and evaluation framework that applies group model building with system dynamics to foster systems thinking through factor diagramming and analysis. To assess the added value of the framework for EWB project planning and development, extensive participant feedback was gathered and evaluated during the workshop and through an optional post-workshop survey.  Supported by thoughtful observations and feedback provided by the EWB members, the model building workshop appeared to help participants reveal and consider project complexities by both visually and quantitatively identifying key non-technical and technical factors that influence project sustainability.  Therefore, system dynamics applied in a group model building workshop offers a powerful supplement to traditional EWB project planning and assessment activities, providing a systems-based tool for EWB teams and partner communities to build capacity and create lasting change.

Author Biographies

Kimberly Pugel, University of Colorado Boulder

Department of Civil, Environmental & Architectural Engineering

Jeffrey P Walters, Universidad Diego Portales, Santiago, Chile
Department of Civil Engineering, Professor


Amadei, B 2016, A Systems Approach to Modeling Community Development Proect., Momentum Press LLC, New York, NY.

Amadei, B, Sandekian, R & Thomas, E 2009, ‘A Model for Sustainable Humanitarian Engineering Projects’, Sustainability, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 1087–1105.

ASME 2011, ‘The State of Mechanical Engineering: Today and Beyond’, retrieved November 11, 2016, from <https://www.asme.org/getmedia/752441b6-d335-4d93-9722-de8dc47321de/State-of-Mechanical-Engineering-Today-and-Beyond.aspx>.

Bagheri, A, Darijani, M, Asgary, A & Morid, S 2010, ‘Crisis in Urban Water Systems during the Reconstruction Period: A System Dynamics Analysis of Alternative Policies after the 2003 Earthquake in Bam-Iran’, Water Resources Management, vol. 24, no. 11, pp. 2567–2596.

Barlas Y. (1996). Formal aspects of model validity and validation in system dynamics models.†System Dynamics Review, vol 12, no. 3, pp. 183-210.

Berg, DR, Lee, T & Buchanan, E 2016, ‘A Methodology for Exploring, Documenting, and Improving Humanitarian Service Learning in the University’, Journal of Humanitarian Engineering, vol. 4, no. 1, retrieved December 30, 2016, from <http://www.ewb.org.au/jhe/index.php/jhe/article/view/47>.

Bossel, H 2007, Systems and Models: Complexity, Dynamics, Evolution, Sustainability, Books on Demand, Norderstedt, Germany.

Chan, A & Fishbein, J 2009, ‘A global engineer for the global community’, The Journal of Policy Engagement, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 4–9.

EWB-USA 2014, ‘Planning, Monitoring, Evaluation, and Learning Program: Program Description’, retrieved June 14, 2016, from <http://www.ewb-usa.org/files/2015/05/PMEL-Program-Description.pdf>.

EWB-USA 2015, ‘Engineers Without Borders USA: 2015 Annual Report’, retrieved November 10, 2016, from <http://www.ewb-usa.org/files/EWB-AR-2015-FINAL.pdf>.

Hjorth, P & Bagheri, A 2006, ‘Navigating towards sustainable development: A system dynamics approach’, Futures, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 74–92.

Lucena, J, Schneider, J & Leydens, JA 2010, ‘Engineering and Sustainable Community Development’, Synthesis Lectures on Engineers, Technology and Society, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 1–230.

Luna-Reyes, LF, Martinez-Moyano, IJ, Pardo, TA, Cresswell, AM, Andersen, DF & Richardson, GP 2006, ‘Anatomy of a group model-building intervention: building dynamic theory from case study research’, System Dynamics Review, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 291–320.

Meadows, DH, Meados, D.L., Randers, J. & Behrens III, W.W. 1972, The Limits to Growth: A Report for the Club of Rome’s Project on the Predicament of Mankind, 381 Park Avenue South, New York, New York 10016.

Neely, K 2015, ‘Complex adaptive systems as a valid framework for understanding community level development’, Development in Practice, vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 785–797.

Neely, K & Walters, J 2016, ‘Using Causal Loop Diagramming to Explore the Drivers of the Sustained Functionality of Rural Water Services in Timor-Leste’, Sustainability, vol. 8, no. 1, p. 57.

Nieusma, D & Riley, D 2010, ‘Designs on development: engineering, globalization, and social justice’, Engineering Studies, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 29–59.

Pruyt, E 2010, ‘Using small models for big issues: Exploratory System Dynamics Modelling and Analysis for insightful crisis management’, in 18th International Conference of the System Dynamics Society, pp. 25–29, retrieved March 19, 2014, from <http://www.systemdynamics.org/conferences/2010/proceed/papers/P1266.pdf>.

Ramalingam, B & Jones, H 2008, Exploring the science of complexity: ideas and implications for development and humanitarian efforts, Overseas Development Institute, London.

Richardson, GP 2011, ‘Reflections on the foundations of system dynamics: Foundations of System Dynamics’, System Dynamics Review, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 219–243.

Richardson, GP 2013, ‘Concept models in group model building: G. P. Richardson: Concept Models in Group Model Building’, System Dynamics Review, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 42–55.

United Nations 2015, ‘Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development’.

Vennix, J 1996, Group Model Building: Facilitating Team Learning Using System Dynamics 1st Edition., Wiley.

Walters, J, Greiner, B, O’Morrow, E & Amadei, B 2017, ‘Fostering systems thinking within Engineers Without Borders student teams using Group Model Building’, International Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 33, no.1 (A), pp. 247-260Walters, JP & Javernick-Will, AN 2015, ‘Long-Term Functionality of Rural Water Services in Developing Countries: A System Dynamics Approach to Understanding the Dynamic Interaction of Factors’, Environmental Science & Technology, vol. 49, no. 8, pp. 5035–5043.

Walters, JP & Litchfield, K 2015, ‘Investigating the Benefits of Group Model Building Using System Dynamics for Engineers Without Borders Students’, retrieved September 5, 2016, from <http://www.academia.edu/download/46371724/Walters_and_Litchfield_2015_GMB_with_EWB.pdf>.

Wolstenholme, EF 1999, ‘Qualitative vs quantitative modelling: the evolving balance’, Journal of the Operational Research Society, pp. 422–428.